<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conscious Junkyard &#187; California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com/category/california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com</link>
	<description>thoughts, ramblings, and rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>California Business Group Wants California Constitution Changed</title>
		<link>http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com/2009/02/25/california-business-group-wants-california-constitution-changed/</link>
		<comments>http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com/2009/02/25/california-business-group-wants-california-constitution-changed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken L. Klaser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears there&#8217;s an effort afoot to change the California Constitution.  I noticed this news item yesterday a couple of different times.

&#8220;More than 300 people gathered to debate the idea Tuesday at a Constitutional Convention Summit. They agreed on one thing: The state&#8217;s system of government is broken.&#8221;

Reportedly, the Summit was organized by a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears there&#8217;s an effort afoot to change the California Constitution.  I noticed this news item yesterday a couple of different times.</p>

<blockquote><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/state_wire/story/1650169.html?mi_rss=Latest%20News">&#8220;More than 300 people gathered to debate the idea Tuesday at a Constitutional Convention Summit. They agreed on one thing: The state&#8217;s system of government is broken.&#8221;</a></blockquote>

<p>Reportedly, the Summit was organized by a business-interest group, the Bay Area Council. Another item that stood out for me was how some reportedly want reform of the initiative process, while it appears they might use the initiative process that exists to make these changes. Is &#8216;use what they don&#8217;t like&#8217; a correct summary of their intent?</p>

<blockquote><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_11777061?">&#8220;Who should be chosen as delegates to a constitutional convention? What issues should be considered? Whose ox gets gored? How do you sell a complex issue to a public that&#8217;s turned off by politics?&#8221;</a></blockquote>

<p>Anyway, this is something to keep an eye on.  There are statements in the article that Californians are uninvolved in politics, but is this even true?  Isn&#8217;t every school kid who attends education for at least 13 compulsory school years (without pay) involved in politics for those years?  Isn&#8217;t everyone who votes involved in politics?  Isn&#8217;t everyone who pays taxes involved in politics?</p>

<p>Well, I guess that&#8217;s my view.  Why are we being told we&#8217;re not involved, when in some cases we have little choice about our involvement?  Does this business group really mean something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com/2009/02/25/california-business-group-wants-california-constitution-changed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California: Bill to Legalize, Regulate, and Tax Marijuana</title>
		<link>http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com/2009/02/24/california-bill-to-legalize-regulate-and-tax-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com/2009/02/24/california-bill-to-legalize-regulate-and-tax-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken L. Klaser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been widely reported yesterday, and the reporting is expanding today, that California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (Democrat-San Francisco) has submitted A.B. 390 to legalize, regulate, and tax marijuana.

Once again the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) has a quick and easy letter you can send to California legislators if you as a citizen of California support this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/latest/story/1646399.html?mi_rss=Latest%20News">widely reported yesterday</a>, and the reporting is expanding today, that California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (Democrat-San Francisco) has submitted A.B. 390 to legalize, regulate, and tax marijuana.</p>

<p>Once again the <a href="http://www.mpp.org/">Marijuana Policy Project</a> (MPP) has a<a href="https://ssl.capwiz.com/mpp/issues/alert/?alertid=12756556"> quick and easy letter you can send to California legislators if you as a citizen of California support this bill, A.B 390</a>.  You can choose among several different letters, by hitting the appropriate link at the site. The <a href="http://blog.mpp.org/">California weblog page of MPP</a> also has some information.</p>

<p>[addition of 03.01.09]: What to read the <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/bilinfo.html">current version of A.B. 390?</a> Enter &#8220;390&#8243; in the appropriate search field and select &#8220;bill number&#8221;, and follow the onscreen promts.[end addition]</p>

<p>I sent mine yesterday, and this time I wrote my own (it has typos, but at this point they can&#8217;t be edited).</p>

<p>Some of the thoughts expressed are based upon my prior post titled <a href="http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com/2009/02/09/san-diego-county-board-of-supervisors-medical-marijuana-and-waiting-to-inhale/">San Diego County Board of Supervisors, Medical Marijuana, and Waiting to Inhale</a>.  Here&#8217;s my letter:</p>

<p><HR></p>

<p>February 23, 2009</p>

<p>[recipient address was inserted here]</p>

<p>Dear [recipient name was inserted here],</p>

<p>It&#8217;s my understanding that California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano has authored 
a bill, A.B. 390, that will legalize and tax marijuana. Additionally, it 
will regulate it similar to how alcohol and cigarettes are currently 
regulated.</p>

<p>This seems like common sense legislation to me.  Recently I was appalled 
to find out that San Diego County has been refusing to issue Medical 
Marijuana IDs to patients with a prescription from their doctors for its 
use, which either prevents them from using this medicine, or subjects them 
and their caregivers to the pressure of arrest.  Caregivers in our county 
are reportedly being stormed by swat-like police teams, their property 
confiscated.  It&#8217;s now about 15-years since Californians legalized medical 
marijuana, and some counties within the state are refusing to follow our 
laws!</p>

<p>I find myself wondering why state authorities haven&#8217;t arrested our County 
Supervisors for failing to follow California law.  When any of the rest of 
us decide to challenge a law in court, as they reportedly have, we still 
have to follow the law that&#8217;s in existence until such time as a court 
overturns it or the legislature agrees on new laws.  I understand this is 
a complex issue, involving federal government prohibition, but it makes a 
poor example when our own local leaders refuse to follow a state law 
passed by ballot proposition some 15-years ago.</p>

<p>Therefore, I&#8217;m feeling quite strongly that legalization and taxation is 
the next step for the people of California to take: San Diego County has 
refused to issue IDs to lawfully prescribed patients, subjecting them to 
arrest, if not prosecution, and the state has failed to arrest the real 
lawbreakers: the county supervisors!  Therefore, to legalize, tax, and 
regulate marijuana makes some sense to ratchet up the pressure on the 
supervisors and over time, upon the Federal government through the U.S. 
Senate.</p>

<p>California just had a record budget stalemate, along with reported tax 
increases and service cutbacks.  Think of the tax revenues that could roll 
in with regulated and taxed marijuana, but also remember all the otherwise 
good people who&#8217;ve been hurt by the insane prohibition of <em>a weed</em> through 
stiff enforcement and jail time. How much money have Californian&#8217;s been 
taxed to process and jail all these citizens all these past years?</p>

<p>Just thinking of these folks&#8217; tragedies over the course of decades breaks 
my heart.</p>

<p>Please support A.B. 390.</p>

<p>Sincerely,</p>

<p>Ken Klaser</p>

<p><HR></p>

<p>The recipients were:<br />
Assemblymember Jeffries<br />
Senator Hollingsworth<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kenklaser.gaiastream.com/2009/02/24/california-bill-to-legalize-regulate-and-tax-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

